Patient care navigation and health copilot AI
Alcott
Alcott’s historical profile describes patient and family visit preparation with clinic delivery. Current pages could not be read in this reassessment. Patient approval of outgoing briefs, correction after delivery, and caregiver authority remain unresolved.
Current verification incomplete. The September 8 assessment records access limitations. The earlier 2026-07-01 evidence has not been freshly confirmed.
Summary judgment · 72 out of 100 toward patient-directed
Historically a hybrid patient/family visit companion with clinic delivery and EHR/CRM integrations. No current page body was recovered.
Potentially agency-expanding, mixed
Alcott’s historical profile describes patient and family visit preparation with clinic delivery. Current pages could not be read in this reassessment. Patient approval of outgoing briefs, correction after delivery, and caregiver authority remain unresolved.
Patient agency
How this tool changes agency
Agendas and records could support reflection and action, but the current pass cannot verify correction of generated summaries or information already written to institutional systems.
All current public controls and changes since July remain unverified
Patient agency assessment
Who sets and changes the goal?
Historical patient preparation and sharing support patient priorities. Patient approval of the exact clinician brief and caregiver authority remain distinct unresolved controls.
What can the patient understand, question, or do?
Agendas and records could support reflection and action, but the current pass cannot verify correction of generated summaries or information already written to institutional systems.
Can the patient evaluate the conditions of use?
Historical named processors and deletion periods must keep their July date. The empty pages do not confirm or refute those commitments.
Text findings
Conditions of use
Published controls and their limits
Historical named processors and deletion periods must keep their July date. The empty pages do not confirm or refute those commitments.
What remains unknown?
Not tested or not established
All current public controls and changes since July remain unverified
Who evaluated this?
AI-assisted public-source draft
Vendor statements describe published conditions, not independently verified behavior. No clinical, security, accessibility, or legal validation is claimed. Earlier evidence remains dated in the report and history.
Sources checked
Source-specific findings and retrieval limitations are recorded in the full report.
Review provenance
Criteria
CAIHL-derived HugoScore framework and September 7 qualitative review priorities. Draft v1.2 numerical anchors remain unadopted.
Reviewer
AI-assisted public-source reassessment prepared in OpenAI Codex.
AI / model
OpenAI Codex / GPT-6
Human review
Hugo Campos authorized publication of these AI-assisted draft reassessments on September 8, 2026. This does not claim comprehensive human verification of every finding.
Review date
2026-09-08
Limitations
All current public controls and changes since July remain unverified No live product use, patient-data upload, account creation, code audit, clinical evaluation, or independent implementation validation.
Review method
Focused public-source reassessment using CAIHL: patient authority, critical capacity, and informed control. Existing evidence plus one focused primary-source pass and at most one targeted follow-up. No live product testing. Numerical scores remain provisional editorial placements, not a new calculation.
Current verification incomplete · Low for current behavior, moderate for frozen historical documentation (AI-assisted draft)