HugoScore hugoscore.org

Patient-controlled health records AI

VYTL

VYTL’s historical profile describes patient-directed record collection and administrative support. Current primary sources could not be recovered sufficiently to refresh the judgment. Its 84 is an unrefreshed baseline, with current verification incomplete.

Current verification incomplete Read full report Open directory

Current verification incomplete. The September 8 assessment records access limitations. The earlier 2026-08-09 evidence has not been freshly confirmed.

84 /100 toward patient-directed
Agency posture Potentially agency-expanding, mixed
The question we ask Who does VYTL serve in this deployment?
Control Historical patient-initiated fax collection and AI record organization, with separate clinic accounts. The August 9 baseline is 84, potentially agency-expanding, mixed.
Agency read Potentially agency-expanding, mixed
Vendor
VYTL Health LLC
Who it serves
Patient-directed, vendor-hosted personal health record AI
Primary User
Patients and family caregivers collecting, organizing, and sharing their own medical records; clinics as a secondary account type
Control Model
Vendor-hosted public service. Controls and downstream processors depend on the assessed deployment.
Patient Impact
Access to originals could let patients check extracted dates and labels. The historical administrative scope does not claim medical interpretation. Current availability and the actual comparison/correction workflow remain unknown.
Profile Status
Current verification incomplete
Last assessed
Sep 8, 2026
Review Confidence
Low for current evidence, historical baseline only (AI-assisted draft)
AI / Model
OpenAI Codex / GPT-6
Human Review
Hugo Campos authorized publication of these AI-assisted draft reassessments on September 8, 2026. This does not claim comprehensive human verification of every finding.

Summary judgment · 84 out of 100 toward patient-directed

Historical patient-initiated fax collection and AI record organization, with separate clinic accounts. The August 9 baseline is 84, potentially agency-expanding, mixed.

Potentially agency-expanding, mixed

VYTL’s historical profile describes patient-directed record collection and administrative support. Current primary sources could not be recovered sufficiently to refresh the judgment. Its 84 is an unrefreshed baseline, with current verification incomplete.

Patient agency

How this tool changes agency

Expands agency when

Access to originals could let patients check extracted dates and labels. The historical administrative scope does not claim medical interpretation. Current availability and the actual comparison/correction workflow remain unknown.

Limits agency when

Current operation, policy text, sharing revocation, extraction correction, export and pricing were not established.

Patient agency assessment

Who sets and changes the goal?

Patient authority

The historical workflow gives patients a way to gather and direct their records. Whether they can revoke shares, preserve a usable copy independently or correct classifications is still unestablished, and should not be inferred from the word ownership.

What can the patient understand, question, or do?

Critical capacity

Access to originals could let patients check extracted dates and labels. The historical administrative scope does not claim medical interpretation. Current availability and the actual comparison/correction workflow remain unknown.

Can the patient evaluate the conditions of use?

Informed control

Processor identity, training conditions and export details cannot be resolved from inaccessible current materials. A failed lookup warrants lower confidence in freshness, not a numerical penalty or an accusation about the vendor.

Text findings

Conditions of use

Published controls and their limits

Processor identity, training conditions and export details cannot be resolved from inaccessible current materials. A failed lookup warrants lower confidence in freshness, not a numerical penalty or an accusation about the vendor.

What remains unknown?

Not tested or not established

Current operation, policy text, sharing revocation, extraction correction, export and pricing were not established.

Who evaluated this?

AI-assisted public-source draft

Vendor statements describe published conditions, not independently verified behavior. No clinical, security, accessibility, or legal validation is claimed. Earlier evidence remains dated in the report and history.

Sources checked

Source-specific findings and retrieval limitations are recorded in the full report.

Review provenance

Criteria

CAIHL-derived HugoScore framework and September 7 qualitative review priorities. Draft v1.2 numerical anchors remain unadopted.

Reviewer

AI-assisted public-source reassessment prepared in OpenAI Codex.

AI / model

OpenAI Codex / GPT-6

Human review

Hugo Campos authorized publication of these AI-assisted draft reassessments on September 8, 2026. This does not claim comprehensive human verification of every finding.

Review date

2026-09-08

Limitations

Current operation, policy text, sharing revocation, extraction correction, export and pricing were not established. No live product use, patient-data upload, account creation, code audit, clinical evaluation, or independent implementation validation.

Review method

Focused public-source reassessment using CAIHL: patient authority, critical capacity, and informed control. Existing evidence plus one focused primary-source pass and at most one targeted follow-up. No live product testing. Numerical scores remain provisional editorial placements, not a new calculation.

Current verification incomplete · Low for current evidence, historical baseline only (AI-assisted draft)